kficanon ([personal profile] kficanon) wrote2012-12-06 11:36 pm

part thirty five



• ANONYMOUS COMMENTING ENABLED
• IP OFF
• NO SPAMMING.
NO PICS. Post the links in the subject line instead.


LINKS
kficanon delicious archive
challenge responses
beta advertisement
Meme Long Challenge Prompts
fic comms on livejournal

POSTING THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF USERS IS A SERIOUS TOS VIOLATION. PLEASE DON'T DO IT

stuff
kfic collab challenge
seoulfulness
killers au
kfa fic exchange fics
girl groups fic exchange
Holiday in Seoul: A winter kink meme

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
i took it as they like each other and avidly diddle each other's dicks in private

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
i think if they hadn't grown up in korea, things could have been different? i definitely don't think they've ever crossed the boundary of friendship, it seems like mutual ego jerking and somewhere along the line, they genuinely starting loving each other.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
um there are gays (and bis) in korea

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
um, anon, when did i say there aren't? key said we're boys, so we can't be in a relationship, which means it isn't a possibility instilled in his head by his culture. if they'd grown up in a gay-positive environment or one where it was more around them growing up, maybe they would have turned out different is all i'm saying.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
assuming the translation is correct though he said they're both guys so he can't SAY they're dating, not that they can't date...

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:18 am (UTC)(link)
that's reaching, imo, but whatever, it's not like there is a right or wrong in this situation. i personally dont see that as some closeted declaration of love.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
after i replied i realized that i could be reaching but it sounds closer to what he said than what you wrote he said...the issue is that there are probably things being lost in translation here too so it's probably better not to try to dissect their words when they might be saying something else entirely lol

while i would never insist that it is a closeted declaration and i think you could be completely right, there are things other than just this interview that lead me to believe that it could mean something. it would take me an eternity to try to explain though and it would probably come out as some convoluted mess so i don't know if i should bother. and i'll sound really delusional.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:52 am (UTC)(link)
i don't have a problem with the quote, but the interpretation. it's not like i can disprove you, it's just my opinion/interpretation so don't worry about it, anon. you could be right for all we know.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:32 am (UTC)(link)
yeah it seemed like he was saying that they do what dating couples do but he couldn't say they were dating because they were boys

but it is fanservice so i guess they want to say something to keep shippers happy

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
i don't believe growing up in korea automatically means that they definitely haven't acted on whatever homosexual impulses they may or may not have had. i'm not going to say that i certainly believe anything about their relationship because i don't, lol, but i'm not going to count anything out just because the country they're from is predominately homophobic.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
no, it's not their environment alone, it's their career choices, their ambitions, their personalities (to me). they might have for all i know, but if i really think about it, i'm not too convinced, they're just too aware of what it looks like and how to profit off of it.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:21 am (UTC)(link)
this is fanservice ofc but if either one of them really likes men i'm sure they'd act on it because the entertainment industry is often more openminded

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
the entertainment industry is often more openminded

that's a pretty big generalization there, anon. but anyway, yes, it's possible. in how i read them, i wouldn't count on it, but of course, i could be wrong.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
well obviously they're aware that shipping themselves makes the fans happy, lol. that's idol 101. ofc it's hard to completely separate what is real and what is getting played up for the sake of fanservice. however, i still think that *if* they wanted to or have pursued something further with each other, they would know both how to market their relationship and how to keep it private enough that they don't get found out.

but w/e w/e, not like we'll ever know lmao. i'm just happy that they give me enough material to ship away like crazy.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
of course they could but neither of them seem like they would prioritize love over shinee? idk, it seems so unlikely to me because shinee are such robots when it comes to the mothership. also jonghyun so loves girls but who knows? they're cute though, and i love seeing them interact so i'm happy too~

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
lol true, shinee are perfect robots, but they all seem very adapt at separating their personal and private lives. i think they're able to compartmentalize what is professional and what is private. also i believe that jonghyun loves just about everything that moves, lol.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
but i think it also helps that they're basically very vanilla people? and true, jonghyun has always been hands on about his affection for people.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
i wouldn't describe either of them as vanilla, especially key. in fact, key has spoken about how badly he wants to stand out.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 05:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 05:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:31 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:15 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:46 am (UTC)(link)
i would think jjong was bi even if there was no key

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:48 am (UTC)(link)
i would too

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 05:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:12 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
jonghyun wasn't perfect when he got caught with shin se kyung

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 05:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-12-12 06:26 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:42 am (UTC)(link)
this i mostly disagree with...

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:46 am (UTC)(link)
elaborate?

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
a much more accurate interpretation

(Anonymous) 2012-12-12 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
thank you, anon. i think so too.