kficanon ([personal profile] kficanon) wrote2012-11-24 03:13 pm

part thirty two



• ANONYMOUS COMMENTING ENABLED
• IP OFF
• NO SPAMMING.
NO PICS. Post the links in the subject line instead.


LINKS
kficanon delicious archive
challenge responses
beta advertisement
Meme Long Challenge Prompts
fic comms on livejournal

POSTING THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF USERS IS A SERIOUS TOS VIOLATION. PLEASE DON'T DO IT

stuff
kfic collab challenge
seoulfulness
killers au
kfa fic exchange fics
unanon party
girl groups fic exchange

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
hijacked would assume that the hijacked comment had taken control of the thread and changed it's trajectory. other than the first comment people are posting groups they would like to talk more about.

therefore, relevant.

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
if the op has said directly that it's for idols that aren't exo or infinite, then it's still really rude to jump in and start talking about exo.

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
all i said was that we could stand to balance out the exo comments so that they're not all about four people

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
but you're not the op of the thread though. if you wanted to, you're free to make another thread

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)
it was relevant to the conversation at hand. a lot of threads veer into off topic territory.

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
anon. if you don't understand why i have a problem then i don't think you ever will. sorry

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
i just don't think that i am being that rude because the title of a thread is not set in stone.

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
lbr then ppl would have complained about us making so many exo threads

but i do agree with you, we should stfu sometimes

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
da but wrong comment? anon didn't say anything about hijacking.

Re: ^

(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
i'm assuming this anon is the same one from below.