Skip to Main Content
kficanon (
kficanon
) wrote
2012
-
11
-
24
03:13 pm
part thirty two
• ANONYMOUS COMMENTING ENABLED
• IP OFF
• NO SPAMMING.
•
NO PICS
. Post the links in the subject line instead.
LINKS
kficanon delicious archive
challenge responses
beta advertisement
Meme Long Challenge Prompts
fic comms on livejournal
POSTING THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF USERS IS A SERIOUS TOS VIOLATION. PLEASE DON'T DO IT
stuff
kfic collab challenge
seoulfulness
killers au
kfa fic exchange fics
unanon party
girl groups fic exchange
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:22 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
hijacked would assume that the hijacked comment had taken control of the thread and changed it's trajectory. other than the first comment people are posting groups they would like to talk more about.
therefore, relevant.
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:24 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
if the op has said directly that it's for idols that aren't exo or infinite, then it's still really rude to jump in and start talking about exo.
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:25 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
all i said was that we could stand to balance out the exo comments so that they're not all about four people
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:26 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
but you're not the op of the thread though. if you wanted to, you're free to make another thread
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:28 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
it was relevant to the conversation at hand. a lot of threads veer into off topic territory.
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:29 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
anon. if you don't understand why i have a problem then i don't think you ever will. sorry
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:30 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
i just don't think that i am being that rude because the title of a thread is not set in stone.
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:48 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
lbr then ppl would have complained about us making so many exo threads
but i do agree with you, we should stfu sometimes
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:25 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
da but wrong comment? anon didn't say anything about hijacking.
Re: ^
(Anonymous)
2012-11-26 03:26 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
i'm assuming this anon is the same one from below.
5000 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)therefore, relevant.
Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)but i do agree with you, we should stfu sometimes
Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ^
(Anonymous) 2012-11-26 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)